Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 3rd September 2010

MP expenses – Malik must repay £36

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 February 2010
A REPORT into MPs' expenses shows Mirfield MP Shahid Malik owes just £36.14 in repayments.
Sir Thomas Legg’s final report looked at expenses claims made by 752 MPs and former MPs between 2004 and 2008.

Yesterday’s report found a total of £1.3m in overpayments to 52 per cent of all MPs – but £800,000 of that has already been repaid.

T
he report said Mr Malik was paid £1,050 for a television in February 2006, £225 more than the guideline price.

He was paid £730 for an armchair in September 2007, exceeding the guideline price by £180, and was also overpaid £935.56 for council tax and summons costs between 2005 and 2007.

Sir Thomas recommended a repayment of £1,340.56 and said £1,304.43 had already been received.

A spokesman for Mr Malik said the MP made his repayments in July before he was asked and was happy to pay the outstanding £36.14.

l Mr Malik has written to Kirklees Council asking that a general election count be held in Dewsbury. Last week the council announced that an overnight count would be held following the election.

Mr Malik said: “I am pleased the count will still take place on election night. It’s a great tradition which we should uphold and it’s good that the council have listened to our arguments on this.

“However I am naturally very disappointed that Dewsbury Town Hall had been abandoned in favour of Huddersfield as the count venue. I have written to the council to ask them to reconsider this decision.”

But council officials have said for logistical reasons the count had to be held in one place.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 February 2010 1:14 PM
  • Source: Mirfield Reporter Edition
  • Location: Mirfield
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.